Approaching
Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Practice with Interactive Multimedia
and Case-Based Reasoning Som
Naidu, The University of Melbourne Mary Oliver, The University
of Southern Queensland Andy Koronios, The University
of Southern Queensland
Back to the main article
Appendix A: Expert
Review CheckList
Expert Review Checklist
REVIEWER: MichelleDUE DATE: asap
Instructions:
Please circle your rating and write comments on each aspect of this interactive
multimedia (IMM) package. 1 represents a rather negative impression on
the scale, 2 represents you are not sure and do not wish to go either
way, and 3 represents the highest and most positive impression.
1=Disagree
2=I am sitting on the fence on this one
3=Agree
AREA 1 - INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
The objectives of this program are made clear to the users.
1 2 3
If not, how could these be improved?
The instructional interactions in this IMM are appropriate for the
objectives.
1 2 3
If not, how could these be improved?
The design of this IMM is based on sound learning theory and principles.
1 2 3
If not, how could this be improved?
The feedback in this IMM is clear.
1 2 3
If not, how could this be made clearer?
The feedback in this IMM is sufficient.
1 2 3
If not, how could this be enhanced?
The pace in this IMM is appropriate.
1 2 3
If not, how could this be improved?
The difficulty level of this IMM is appropriate.
1 2 3
If not, how could this be adjusted?
AREA 2 - INTERFACE DESIGN
The screen design of this IMM follows sound principles.
1 2 3
If not, how could this be improved?
Color is appropriately used in this IMM.
1 2 3
If not, how could this be improved?
Text is appropriately used in this IMM.
1 2 3
If not, how could this be improved?
The screen displays are easy to understand.
1 2 3
If not, how could this be improved?
AREA 3 - PROGRAM FUNCTIONALITY
This IMM operated flawlessly.
1 2 3
List any problems you encountered?
AREA 4 - CONTENT
The subject matter content is accurately represented in the program.
1 2 3
List any deficiencies you encountered?
The subject matter content is adequately dealt with in the program.
1 2 3
List any deficiencies you encountered?
The subject matter content is pitched at a suitable level in the program.
1 2 3
List any deficiencies you encountered?
AREA 5 - CLINICAL ACCURACY AND COMPREHENSIVENESS
The clinical tasks are appropriately dealt with in the program.
1 2 3
List any inaccuracies
you encountered?
Appendix B:User
Evaluation Questionnaire and Interface Rating Scale
Clinical Decision Making in Nursing A Case-Based Reasoning Architecture User Evaluation
Important. We are interested
in your impressions of this multimedia program. The information you provide
here will be used solely for the purposes of improving it, so please respond
to all the questions in the spaces provided.
General Information
Please indicate
your age group.
<20
years
20-25years
25-35
years
>35
years
Please indicate
your experience as a nurse.
None
1-2
years
2-3
years
>3
years
What do you normally
use computers for (select as many as you need to)?
How often do you
use computers?
Indicate your comfort
level with the use of computers generally?
If you feel uncomfortable
with computers, indicate what problems do you have with computers?
The following
questions relate to your "use" of the program.
Did you have any
problems starting to use the CD?
What was the problem,
if yes?
How did you find
navigating (or moving about) in this program?
If it was confusing,
what was confusing about moving around in this program?
How much time did
you spend on this CD program altogether before filling in this questionnaire?
<
30 minutes
30-60
minutes
60-90
minutes
>90
minutes
Rate the helpfulness
of the "User's Manual" provided with the CD?
Rate the helpfulness
of the "Case-Based Reasoning Guide" accompanying the CD?
Which one of the
following approaches did you use to work through the program? And please
say why you chose to take that approach.
How clear were
the guidelines in the programfor preparing a care plan
for George Parker?
If you found the guidelines
confusing, what was so confusing about them?
How clear are the
navigation cues for moving around on the CD?
If you found the clues
confusing, what was so confusing about them?
The following
questions relate to the "content" of the program.
How interesting
did you find the following activities on the CD? Tick the appropriate
box.
Very
interesting
Interesting
Uninteresting
Handover
Attending
to Patient
Listening
to Stories
Making Decisions
Preparing
Report
How useful
did you find the following activities on the CD? Tick the appropriate
box.
Very
useful
Useful
Not
useful
Handover
Attending
to Patient
Listening
to Stories
Making Decisions
Preparing
Report
How realistic did
you find the scenario on anaphylaxis on the CD?
If you found the scenario
unrealistic, then please explain why?
Do you think the
scenario on the management of anaphylaxis demonstrate that the care
provided is evidence-based?
Why not?
Do you think the
scenario on the management of anaphylaxis demonstrate that the care
provided represents best practice?
Why not?
The following
questions relate to the "look and feel" of the program.
Ease of use
is concerned with the facility with which you were able to interact
with this program. How difficult or easy was this for you?
What was difficult
about the program?
Navigation
is concerned with your ability to move through the content of this program
in an intentional manner. Was it difficult or easy to move around the
program?
What was difficult
about moving around the program?
Information
overload refers to being faced with too much information such
that it becomes unmanageable. Did you feel overwhelmed by the information
presented in this program?
What was unmanageable
in the program?
Overview
refers to a facility in the program, which can be either a map or an
introductory audio, or video clip that provides a snapshot of what is
to come next. How useful was this facility in this program?
What was not useful
about this facility?
Screen design
refers to suitable use of features like text, icons, graphics, color,
and other visual attributes. How did you find the use of these attributes
in this program generally?
What was irritating
about their use in this program?
Information
presentation refers to whether the content of the program is
presented in a meaningful form. How did you find the presentation of
information in this program?
What was confusing about the program?
Overall functionality
in interactive multimedia programs refers to the perceived utility (i.e.,
communication of the message) of the program. What did you think about
this?
What was so dysfunctional
in the program?
Aesthetics
refers to the artistic aspects of interactive multimedia programs including
sleek use of style etc which can be pleasing or rather irritating. How
would you rate this program on aesthetics?
What was so distasteful
about the program?
List the features
of this program you liked most.
What important
principles about clinical decision making in nursing have you
picked up from this program?