![]()
|
Abstract |
|
![]() |
1. Introduction The impact of this impediment is even more pronounced when considering biodiversity questions. There is a tremendous urgency to identify those factors that result in major impacts on biodiversity, especially in light of rapid species declines and extinctions. Biologists are collecting vast amounts of data on the impact of global warming, the consequences of environmental contamination, the destruction of natural resources, and the cause of population declines. The development of new computational methods would allow these data to be used more efficiently to model global patterns of environmental and species change and understand biocomplexity and the environment, with the ultimate goal of protecting and preserving biodiversity. Fortunately, bioinformatics, the field devoted to developing computational solutions to expand the use of biological data, is one of the fastest growing subfields in biology. In fact, recently both the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Health identified bioinformatics as “the essential underpinning of all biological fields in the 21st century” (NIH-NSF, 2002). Some have even argued that in the very near future, most competitive life scientists will possess expertise in both biological and computer science. (Park, 2001). Unfortunately, the largest barrier to training the next generation of bioinformaticians is that few students are attracted to both biology and computer science. The problem is even more obvious in biodiversity informatics where the data is collected in the field and the computational methods are derived in the computer laboratory. Here we describe an ongoing project designed to give students practical training in both computer science and biology, and to foster their interest in the integration of both fields. The project follows the new paradigm of science education in which: 1) students perform real science as they construct meaning and acquire understanding; 2) students develop thinking processes and are encouraged to seek answers that enhance their knowledge and acquire an understanding of the physical universe in which they live; and 3) students are presented with problem-solving activities that incorporate authentic, real-life questions and generalization to broader ideas and applications (Christiansen, 1995). |
![]() |
![]() |
2. Methods and Exercises |
|
![]() |
2.1 University Students A volunteer team of three early graduate-level computer science students
and three undergraduate biology students were given the following challenges:
1) develop a hypothesis related to biodiversity at a local conservation
site, 2) collect data to support or refute the hypothesis, 3) develop
a Web-accessible database with simple-to-use access and analysis functions,
and 4) determine the results of data collection, and 5) design a Website
to present the results of the exercise. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Figure 1. Satellite photo (courtesy of the US Geological Survey) of Bray conservation area with various habitat types labeled. |
![]() |
2.1.2 Hypothesis Testing |
![]() |
![]() |
2.1.3 Database Development
and Use The team worked together to analyze the data in the database. Amphibians were found in only two habitat types: streams and ponds. There was a significant difference in the number of frogs found in the different habitat types, with more found in the pond. They found only three amphibian species, and only one was present in consistently measurable densities. The results were lower than expected (relative to other sites), indicating that the area may be under the influence of factors leading to reduced amphibian populations. However, because the data collection was conducted during one season, it is possible that the results reflect a seasonal effect, and that there are more amphibians present than the data indicate. Therefore, the team decided to develop a long-term biodiversity monitoring program at the conservation site. Subsequently, more students have become involved, and the team visits the site at least once per month to collect data. The team has also led exercises for several local high school and junior high groups (see sections below), and is currently working to involve scout troops in the monitoring efforts through a collaborative outreach program between the Missouri Department of Conservation and the University of Missouri-Rolla. |
![]() |
![]() |
2.2 High School Students |
![]() |
![]() |
2.3 Middle School Students |
![]() |
![]() |
3. Results and Summary At the university-level, the exercises facilitated cross-training of and open-communication between the biologists and computer scientists on the research team. It allowed computer science students to experience first-hand the processes used by biologists to test hypotheses and capture data, which made it easier for them to develop the database. It also gave them insights into how information access/analysis software should be designed for end-users who are untrained as computer professionals. In turn, it demonstrated to the biologists the importance of collecting data such that they can be easily stored and queried electronically, showed them how a database was designed and developed, and gave them experience designing Web pages. Additionally, by conducting the exercises for the high school and middle school students, the university students further developed their hypothesis-testing abilities. They also had the opportunity to view others utilizing their database and user-interface, and were able to identify possible usability enhancements. Subsequently, the computer science students modified the user-interface of the database to make it easier for the biologists to enter data. An additional outcome of this exercise was that university students were given the opportunity to teach science to younger students. It is hoped that these sorts of interactions will help to foster an interest in science education. And given the current dearth of science teachers, particularly at the secondary level, developing an interest in science education may be one of the most important outcomes of this project. At the high school level, the students learned about scientific research projects and hypothesis development. They also learned how biology and computer science combine to answer questions about biodiversity. Finally, by gaining hands-on experience answering their own questions, they were given the opportunity to see science as something that is within their capabilities, and scientists as accessible. At the middle school level, the students were given a first-hand look at science in action. They learned about amphibians and biodiversity and how to collect data to test a hypothesis. They were also given the opportunity to interact with college scientists in a fun learning environment. |
![]() |
![]() |
4. Value-Added Benefits |
![]() |
![]() |
5. Acknowledgements |
![]() |
![]() |
6. References Park, P. (2001). Training for the Bioinformatics Boon. The Scientist. 15(20):31. Christensen, M. 1995. Providing Hands-On, Minds-On, and Authentic Learning Experiences in Science. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL). (http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/science/sc500.htm) |
|