![]() |
Abstract 1. Background Running counter to the objective of providing a positive experience in the engineering graphics course are several obstacles common in academia. Economics dictate high student to teacher ratios even in a laboratory setting. Laboratory assistants do not have the same level of training or motivation as the professor. Students enter each course with varying backgrounds, learning abilities, and learning styles. Such realities often lead to a course that caters to the average student, leaving slower students confused and brighter students bored. The objective for development of the engineering graphics course was to provide a positive first experience in engineering, which included giving students hours of individual instruction, while reducing the teaching load of the instructor. In a first attempt to accomplish this objective a video taped tutorial session was developed. The tutorial was a compilation of staged individual tutorial sessions that addressed the most common problems encountered by students completing the homework. Students who came for individual tutoring were first required to watch the tutoring video as most of the student’s questions were addressed on the tape. The feedback from the experiment was very positive and required only a few hours of staged tutoring. One criticism of the effectiveness of the video tutoring was the separation of the tutoring and application. Students would go to the library to watch the video and understand the technique presented, but would forget the material later when they tried to apply the information at the computer lab. To address this student concern a screen capture program was used to record screen activity and audio for the staged tutorial sessions. The reception of these tutorials, which could be viewed in the computer lab and run simultaneously with the CADD software, was exceptional. Individual tutoring of every student in the lab by the instructor was now possible and did not require additional time or staff. On the basis of these encouraging results, the tutorial movies became the first step in the development of a comprehensive multimedia instructional CD/web page (Figure 1). The project to date includes hours of tutorial movies, lecture presentations of all class lectures for the semester, web based games to reinforce significant course topics, and a series of interactive web based quizzes that prepare students for class exams. The site is made available to students on CD and is maintained on a local server as a public web site, www.engr.panam.edu\~scrown\graphics. The project has been successful to the point where students rarely seek individual tutoring during lab and almost never need help outside of lab. The CD/web page accommodates the different learning styles and abilities of students in the class by providing a wide range of instructional material (Carver et al., 1996, Ellis, 1996). What was only partially accomplished in the lab with the constant presence of an instructor and lab assistant is now accomplished with a single lab assistant who spends the bulk of his time grading. The most recent stage of development in the project has been the addition of full multimedia lecture presentations. The entire course is now offered as an on-line course with hours of interactive tutorial and review material that gives students a positive first experience in engineering while requiring less faculty time. The successful development and use of web-based instructional material is not unique to this project. However its full capacity is still emerging. Many multimedia teaching projects have been successfully developed for other courses and disciplines. Web-based teaching modules on internal combustion engines were used by Kirkpatrick et al. (1997) to teach fundamental concept of thermodynamics and heat transfer to engineering students. Two examples in the area of engineering design can be found in the work done by Haugsjaa & Woolf, (1996) and Hill et al. (1998). Work done by Suni & Ross (1997) shows the effect of learning styles on student learning associated with the use of hypermedia materials developed to teach materials science. Multimedia teaching tools for engineering can be found in increasing numbers on the internet from static web pages to sophisticated Java applets (Reed & Afjeh, 1998). Additionally multimedia teaching resources can be found in many disciplines such as mathematics (Antchev et al., 1996), and computer science (Marshall & Hurley, 1996). |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() The essential capabilities of the presentation software used for this project were the ability to efficiently embed large high quality line drawings and images into slides; the availability of a free viewer for viewing the presentation; and simple but significant navigation capabilities in the viewer. Two limitations in the software that were encountered were the inability to embed animated GIFS into the presentation and the absence of a web browser plug-in for earlier versions of browsers. The presentation software allows for the creation of HTML pages with control buttons and an index of all slides in the presentation. Initially the lecture presentations were set up using this format. The major limitations of this format are the fixed image resolution and the fact that the HTML pages also do not allow for slide animation. Because of these limitations the lectures were saved in the original presentation format with links to the files from the web page. This requires that the browser be set up to launch the presentation viewer program based on file type. An HTML page showing how to setup the computer and the web browser was added to the web site to address this issue. An alternative would be to use a presentation viewer plug-in. This would also require some setup by the user but would give a more integrated feel to the presentations. The full multimedia lecture series is made available to all students in the course. The lectures are included on the tutorial CD without audio or video clips and only occupy 2MB of disk space. The lecture presentations with full audio and video clips are included on 3 additional CDs as they require over 1.5GB of disk space. Students taking the course on-line solely view the multimedia lecture presentations. Students attending the live lectures may use the multimedia lecture presentations for review. There is more time in class for questions and interaction since all the information needed for the course is in a format that is easily accessible to the students. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() The usefulness of the tutorial movies lies in the fact that they run on the same platform as the CAD program that is being taught. The movie can be paused while the student completes a portion of the assignment and then continued. In this fashion students having difficulty with the homework will follow the tutorial step by step while more advanced students will watch the entire movie and then complete the assignment on their own. The movies can be broken into major segments that allow the user to jump forward or back to the start of each segment. The player also allows the user to fast forward through each segment. The movies require about 400-700kB/min (typically 60-70% for audio) of storage for a 600X800 screen with 24 bit color and 8 bit mono sound sampled at 11kHz and compressed with a 2:1 compression ratio. The size of a typical 10 minute tutorial would be about 4mB. There are several notable limitations to the software which affect the use and creation of the tutorial movies. The greatest challenge is to create a long movie that does not contain pauses or errors since the screen capture program does not allow for editing of movies. If a long pause or error is made during the recording the movie must be redone. Completing a ten-minute engineering drawing without pauses or errors requires planning and several attempts. One way to address this is to record the tutorial in segments saving each as a separate movie. The segments can then be compiled into a single tutorial movie. Therefore, if an error is made in the last segment, only the last portion needs to be re-recorded. The screen capture program is also sensitive to the video drivers used. When using the CAD program a portion of the cursor often disappears, and occasionally the program would not refresh the video when objects were added or erased. The use of some drawing and editing commands had to be avoided to address this problem. There are a number of drawbacks with the program related to playback. First, the image size is fixed at the time of recording so a low level of resolution must be used to accommodate a variety of users. Second, the player does not allow the user to rewind the video except to the start of each segment. If the user misses a step in the tutorial, the whole segment has to be replayed. This can be frustrating to students and is their primary complaint about the tutorials. Finally, the screen fonts in the movies do not always show up when the movies are played back in Windows NT using the special NT player. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Table 1. Results of student opinion survey given during the final week of the semester. |
![]() |
![]() The first item in Table 1, the overall rating of the instructor, is used as a benchmark for teaching effectiveness. It is interesting to note that the overall student evaluation of the instructor has not been significantly affected by the introduction of the new teaching methods and materials. This indicates that the students have adapted well to the changes in the course, specifically the substitution of personal contact with the instructor for computer based tutorials. It is likely that if a personal connection were developed between students and the instructor by establishing a significant physical presence in the lab, there would be a marked increase in evaluations. Since student evaluations are conducted near the close of the course, the negative attitudes of students who drop because of a lack of interpersonal connection with the instructor are not reflected on evaluations. Two responses on the survey suggest that the students have benefited from the change in pedagogy. The first is in response to the "clarity of communications in the classroom." A 16% increase in student response indicates that students are understanding the material presented to them. This is especially significant since the breadth of material covered in the course has been increased. A slight increase was also measured in their response to "enthusiasm with which you would recommend this instructor to other students." This increase is important to our goal of providing the students with a positive first experience in an engineering course. A significant negative drop was measured in response to "encouragement of students to express ideas." This decrease was expected as the opportunity for interaction between the student and instructor has been significantly reduced. One opportunity to increase the expression of ideas from student to instructor is to give the students greater exposure to design problems in the homework. The time and effort that students repeatedly give to the open-ended design project demonstrates that students enjoy communicating their ideas to the instructor. Further development of the project will include simple open-ended design homework problems. Innovative student solutions could be posted on the public web site as an encouragement to students. A second survey specifically targeting student opinions about the CD tutorial was given to students mid-semester before significant attrition occurs. Responses to ten of the questions included on the survey are shown in Table 2. All responses on the survey strongly indicate that the students believe that the CD is a benefit to their learning and to the course. In response to the statement "The tutorial CD is a useful tool for this course". 83% indicated that they strongly agree. No one responded negatively. In response to the survey question "How could the CD be improved?" one student answered "Doesn't need improvement." Such a response was more than twice as frequent as any other response, which indicates that the students find the CD an effective teaching tool. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() Students rated the following statements on a scale: 5) Strongly Agree, 4) Agree, 3) Neutral, 2) Disagree, 1) Strongly Disagree
|
![]() Table 2. Results of student opinion survey regarding use of the tutorial CD. |
![]() |
![]() Other responses indicate that the students regularly use the CD in lab and find it helpful for understanding and reviewing lecture material and understanding and completing homework assignments. Approximately 90% found the information well organized and easy to access. These responses indicate that the students adapt well to the html web-based format. Use of this popular medium gives the students a familiar environment in which to explore and learn engineering graphics. Two questions deal specifically with the use of the CD tutorial as compared to the traditional textbook as a reference source. Over 80% of responses favored the use of the CD to a textbook and agreed that "the CD supports the course in a way that a textbook could not." These responses suggest development of similar projects for other course content might be more effective than traditional methods, especially if provided as additional resources to the student. In specific response to the statement "A tutorial CD would be helpful for other courses," 85% indicated a positive response. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]()
|
![]() |